Poetic Love Love commercial compliance

Poetic Love Love commercial compliance I'm the last romantic? This is a very difficult question for me! I remember the times when love seems to be more pure and clear. A boy saw a girl he loved, smiled embarrassed him, giving him hope. The desire was fueled by hope, and is the ideal time to cook a recipe for romantic love. Any continued thoughts of peace during the night, while watching the stars and wishes, sweet love wishes! Days passed, the baby can? Not your thoughts on the track, loved by his beautiful princess. Another idea, a few days later, the fire would continue until the child? No longer, and moves to the next step: a romantic poem and roses, even chocolate candy. Beautiful! I? Do not want to overdo it with the inclusion of a balcony in this case .. Ma? S admit, those were the good old days of love and poetry. Today, everything seems so empty and meaningless. The media always shows more violence and sex, love to push away our lives, replacing it with the sole desire. Now women are increasingly interested in the bank account and the child limousine units, and probably would be the poetry and sweet as a crime or as unimportant as it would be very expensive and not perfume or a necklace. The boy, however, is not it? Simply tremble in his voice, him? Sa stable person who should? Do not let losing his lack of confidence. Him? S driving his luxury car, clothes, after the latest fashion, perfumes and all that, with sunglasses to get a better attitude. He goes home, gives him a ho, and then take your partner the most expensive places to impress. It probably happened in most of the time. Very nice, some might say. Well, I'm sorry, but I am one of those researchers who have won? Give it? New age love?. I stick with the love poem that must be used for a long time, the incurable romantic. You can if you want to contradict the whole world? And freedom of opinion, but I am still stuck on the last Mohican the idea that love and poetry come together as a blessing, and you should be? Not be to.